Home Site Map Contact Us

Agunot-ORA
Beis Din
Domestic Violence
Erev Rav
Jewish Divorce
Jewish Marriage
Justice Denied
Passaic NJ Issues
Mesirah
Mishpatim
News
Links
Orthodox Feminism
Restoring Justice

 

 

KolKoreh-70Rabbis
KolKoreh-Archaos
Rav Klein on M'sirah
The Mesira Machine

 

 

 

 

 

Kol Koreh on Issur Archaos

An Unofficial, Informal Translation of the Kol Koreh is provided below

 

Click Here to Download the Document in PDF Format

 

 

 

 

KOL KOREH

 

Let It Be Known and Revealed

 

That every Jewish man and woman who transgresses the faith and litigates in civil courts without the permission of a Bais Din, have lost their right, and their legal opponent in Bais Din has the upper hand, if they have caused them any financial loss in the civil court then he is obligated to reimburse him. If he has won a judgment in civil court, then his legal opponent is not obligated to pay him the judgment according to the Torah (as explained in Choshen Mishpat, Chapter 26). The husband of a wife who litigated in civil court is allowed to obtain a HETER MEAH RABBANIM immediately, and she should not be granted a GET until she compensates him for all his losses, and she should provide collateral that she will not return to the civil courts, and if she returns, the GET is annulled retroactively, as ruled in Shulchan Aruch.

 

A) As per Choshen Mishpat Chapter 26, paragraph A, it is prohibited to litigate before non-Jewish courts etc.; and a Bais Din is required to ostracize, and to apply corporal punishment until the Plaintiff withdraws his lawsuit from civil court.
 

B) Those utilizing the civil courts are judged as MOSRIM, along with all those who act in concert with them.
 

C) EIDUS is accepted against a MOSER even while he is not present.
 

D) Let it be known that a wife who litigates a divorce in civil court, that it is very difficult for her to obtain a kosher GET, because there is always a likelihood that she will return to the civil court once she obtains a GET, and thus the GET will become invalid, as explained in Seder HaGET, paragraph 81, where if the husband states "had I known before I provided a GET (that she would return to civil court), I would not have divorced her", and thus the GET is invalid by a SAFEK. All the more so here, where he gave the GET on condition that she would not drag him back to civil court, and if she transgresses thus, it is an erroneous GET, and it is certainly invalid. And if she remarries the children are MAMZERIM, and therefore it is impossible to provide a GET under any circumstances if there exists any suspicion that she will return to civil court to continue litigating (after the husband has provided a GET), it is therefore likely that she will have to wait a long time until it will be clarified that she will not return to civil courts again. Therefore the House of Israel should be forewarned to refrain from utilizing civil courts, aside from the awesome sin of utilizing civil courts, and Peace be upon Israel.
 

E) Both husband and wife are prohibited from making any new claims against each other after a GET is provided in a Bais Din, and all the more so in civil courts.
 

F) Rabbis who allow Jews to litigate in civil courts, in a situation where their adversary is not refusing to litigate in a Bais Din, and where no SERUV has been issued against their adversary - it is forbidden to litigate by them, and their halachic rulings are void, and all their HECHSHERIM are void, and all their bread is PAS AKUM, and their wine is YAYIN NESECH, and it is forbidden to daven by them, until they will publicly repent from their evil ways, as the Remah ruled "We ostracize those who are acting in concert with Jews who appear before the civil courts."
 

G) Rabbis who accept Jews in DINEI Torah while they are litigating in civil courts - there is no obligation on the other party to answer their claims, and whatever these rabbis do and rule has no value, and their status is less than the status of a Bais Din of simpletons and ignoramuses, as the Great Rabbinic Authorities have clarified thus. It is also pertinent to note that a Restraining Order (or Order of Protection, etc.) is also considered utilizing civil courts in violation of HALACHA. In such a case, permission from a Bais Din is required if there is adequate time to obtain it, as long as it is not an actual life threatening situation.

 

And whoever obeys the Torah will blossom in his days, and whatever endeavor he turns to, he will succeed, and he will dwell in security and peace. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

horizontal rule

Agunot-ORA ] Beis Din ] Domestic Violence ] Erev Rav ] Jewish Divorce ] Jewish Marriage ] Justice Denied ] Passaic NJ Issues ] Mesirah ] Mishpatim ] News ] Links ] Orthodox Feminism ] Restoring Justice ]

 

Copyright © 2005 Mishpat Tsedek. All Rights Reserved.